Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Indian-American Subway owner orchestrated massive U-visa fraud with Louisiana police chiefs

U-visa fraud

Business owner Chandrakant Patel (R) then allegedly paid law enforcement officers $5,000 per fake report in exchange for official documentation falsely claiming these individuals were crime victims.

X/@libsoftiktok

Indian American businessman Chandrakant “Lala” Patel is at the center of a massive federal visa fraud scheme that has resulted in the indictment of three current and former Louisiana police chiefs along with two other law enforcement officials. The charges, which spotlight a years-long conspiracy to abuse the federal U-visa program, have sent shockwaves through both the Indian American and law enforcement communities.

Who is Chandrakant “Lala” Patel?


Chandrakant Patel, known locally as “Lala,” is an Oakdale, Louisiana, businessman and Subway franchisee with deep ties in regional business circles. Originally hailing from India, Patel became an established fixture in Oakdale through his Subway outlets and various local investments, often described by acquaintances as personable and savvy.

However, his reputation now faces a profound rupture as federal authorities have identified him as the mastermind of an extensive criminal operation that functioned, in effect, as a black-market visa mill.

 

The Alleged Scheme: Details and Modus Operandi

Beginning in December 2015 and continuing until July 2025, federal prosecutors allege Patel orchestrated a lucrative and sophisticated scheme exploiting the U-visa: a federal program designed to protect immigrant victims of violent crimes and encourage cooperation with law enforcement. The U-visa, passed as part of the 2000 Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act, was intended to support crime victims willing to assist authorities and prosecute offenders. It also offers a pathway to legal status—and potentially citizenship—for qualifying immigrants and their family members.

However, according to the 62-count federal indictment, Patel and his co-conspirators grossly abused this system. Immigrants seeking U-visas allegedly contacted Patel or others linked to him.

Patel would, in turn, solicit police chiefs and marshals willing to produce false police reports naming these immigrants as victims of armed robbery—a qualifying violent crime under the U-visa program. For these forged documents, immigrants paid a typical price of $5,000 per person, part of which Patel allegedly kicked back to his law enforcement accomplices.

Law Enforcement Collusion: Names and Roles

The operation depended on the complicity of local law enforcement. Those also indicted are:


  • Chad Doyle, Chief of Police, Oakdale
  • Glynn Dixon, Chief of Police, Forest Hill
  • Tebo Onishea, former Chief of Police, Glenmora
  • Michael “Freck” Slaney, Marshal of Oakdale Ward 5
These officials are charged with conspiracy to commit visa fraud, mail fraud, and (except Onishea) money laundering. According to the indictment, they issued, signed, and certified dozens of fabricated police reports, each listing multiple immigrants as victims in crimes that never happened. Most of those “victims” were not known in their local Louisiana communities and had no legitimate connection to the fabricated incidents.


Doyle and Dixon were arrested at a law enforcement conference in Baton Rouge—a striking turn that underscored the seriousness of the allegations. This marks one of the largest-ever law enforcement indictments linked to visa fraud nationally.

Charges and Potential Penalties


Chandrakant Patel faces the most extensive list of charges:

  • Conspiracy to commit visa fraud
  • Bribery
  • 24 counts of mail fraud
  • 8 counts of money laundering
  • The law enforcement officials each face:
  • Conspiracy
  • 6 counts of visa fraud
  • 6 counts of mail fraud
  • 1 or more counts of money laundering (except Onishea)
Each defendant, if convicted, could face up to five years for conspiracy, ten years for each visa fraud charge, and twenty years for each mail fraud charge. Patel faces an additional ten years on the bribery count. Every count also carries up to a $250,000 fine. The federal government is seeking forfeiture of any ill-gotten gains, including bank accounts, real estate, and vehicles connected to the alleged crimes.


How the Fraud Worked

Federal officials described the criminal structure as deliberate and repetitive. Immigrants or connectors—sometimes from far beyond Louisiana—would pay thousands of dollars to Patel. Patel then coordinated directly with the indicted police chiefs and marshals, who issued and signed fake reports of armed robberies. These reports were certified using the federal I-918 Supplement B form, part of the official documentation required for a U-visa application. The scheme is believed to have involved “hundreds” of payments and fraudulent police reports over a decade, according to Acting U.S. Attorney Alexander Van Hook.

The fraudulent reports were then sent via mail to the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), forming part of the paper trail that enabled beneficiaries to remain in the country legally. Each report was key to establishing the applicant as a bona fide crime victim, when in fact, local records indicate that the purported robberies never occurred.


The Victims and the U-Visa ProgramThe U-visa program was designed as both a protective humanitarian tool and a law enforcement incentive—helping police prosecute otherwise hard-to-solve crimes by empowering vulnerable victims. However, the abuse committed in this Louisiana scheme undermines that intent. As Van Hook explained, “U visas serve a valuable purpose... and this is the case where the U visas were abused”. One disturbing detail uncovered during the investigation was the statistical anomaly: an unusual wave of armed robberies involving people not from the area, which triggered federal suspicion.


About 10,000 U-visas are granted annually, per the latest Department of Homeland Security data, and the impact of this fraud is far-reaching—since the U-visa can benefit both the recipient and immediate family members.


How Patel Was Identified as Mastermind


Federal prosecutors contend that Patel acted as the fixer and financial middleman, collecting payments from immigrants and negotiating bribes with law enforcement. He is noted as having the most charges and allegedly receiving hundreds of thousands of dollars during the course of the operation. His role as a Subway franchisee and businessman provided both community standing and elaborate cover for these illicit activities. Investigators allege that Patel would sometimes pay as much as $5,000 to other law enforcement agents for supporting the scheme and producing fraudulent documentation.

Investigation and Broader Law Enforcement EffortThe case is being prosecuted as part of Operation Take Back America, a larger federal crackdown on immigration fraud and official corruption, involving the Department of Justice, Department of Homeland Security, FBI, and IRS, among others. Prosecutors emphasized that the case does not reflect widespread corruption within Louisiana police agencies, but targets specific individuals who betrayed their public trust.


Community and Institutional ResponseThe City of Oakdale responded quickly to the arrests, stating, “We understand the seriousness of this situation and are committed to full cooperation,” vowing transparency and compliance with the law. The affair has rattled local law enforcement and sparked renewed debate about both the vulnerability and the value of the U-visa program.


The Chandrakant Patel visa fraud case pulls back the curtain on one of the most audacious schemes to exploit U.S. immigration law in recent memory. What began as an attempt to help crime victims gain legal status became a profit-driven operation built on systemic deception, official corruption, and the deliberate subversion of federal protections.

As the federal trial proceeds, Patel, the police officials, and their co-conspirators face the prospect of significant prison time and fines—while the broader community reckons with the fallout for both victims and public trust.